ABC/HR for Java, Version 0.52b, 13 août 2007
Testname: Sample02 - Bachpsichord

Tester: guruboolez

1L = Sample02\Sample02_4.wav
2R = Sample02\Sample02_3.wav
3R = Sample02\Sample02_1.wav
4R = Sample02\Sample02_5.wav
5R = Sample02\Sample02_2.wav

Ratings on a scale from 1.0 to 5.0

---------------------------------------
General Comments: 
---------------------------------------
1L File: Sample02\Sample02_4.wav
1L Rating: 1.0
1L Comment: 
---------------------------------------
2R File: Sample02\Sample02_3.wav
2R Rating: 1.5
2R Comment: vibrating notes (tremolo), strong smearing... very bad. Positive point: no perceptible lowpass to my ears
---------------------------------------
3R File: Sample02\Sample02_1.wav
3R Rating: 2.0
3R Comment: smearing is really excessive and sounds like a sudden jump in noise (noise-packet typical of SBR) which has a strange brilliance (metallic). Better mark than 2R because there's no tremolo effect anymore
---------------------------------------
4R File: Sample02\Sample02_5.wav
4R Rating: 2.5
4R Comment: Sound isn't too bad; in fact it shares the same kind of artefacts than 3R: lot of smearing/noise-packet on each note. These problems are simply less irritating (no brilliance/metallic effect)
---------------------------------------
5R File: Sample02\Sample02_2.wav
5R Rating: 3.0
5R Comment: The most lowpassed (low anchor excepted). Harpsichord is therefore less saturated which isn't great. Some smearing (much more subtle than previous contenders) is also audible. Mark should stay below 3.0/5 but it would imply a different scale in order to rank the other files.
---------------------------------------

ABX Results:
Original vs Sample02\Sample02_3.wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.0030
Original vs Sample02\Sample02_2.wav
    12 out of 12, pval < 0.001
Original vs Sample02\Sample02_5.wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.0030
Original vs Sample02\Sample02_4.wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.0030
Original vs Sample02\Sample02_1.wav
    8 out of 8, pval = 0.0030


---- Detailed ABX results ----
Original vs Sample02\Sample02_3.wav
Playback Range: 00.000 to 24.000
    2:17:33 PM p 1/1 pval = 0.5
    2:17:36 PM p 2/2 pval = 0.25
    2:17:38 PM p 3/3 pval = 0.125
    2:17:40 PM p 4/4 pval = 0.062
    2:17:41 PM p 5/5 pval = 0.031
    2:17:42 PM p 6/6 pval = 0.015
    2:17:44 PM p 7/7 pval = 0.0070
    2:17:46 PM p 8/8 pval = 0.0030

Original vs Sample02\Sample02_2.wav
Playback Range: 00.000 to 24.000
    2:19:07 PM p 1/1 pval = 0.5
    2:19:10 PM p 2/2 pval = 0.25
    2:19:14 PM p 3/3 pval = 0.125
    2:19:20 PM p 4/4 pval = 0.062
    2:19:23 PM p 5/5 pval = 0.031
    2:19:34 PM p 6/6 pval = 0.015
    2:19:41 PM p 7/7 pval = 0.0070
    2:19:45 PM p 8/8 pval = 0.0030
    2:19:48 PM p 9/9 pval = 0.0010
    2:19:50 PM p 10/10 pval < 0.001
    2:19:53 PM p 11/11 pval < 0.001
    2:19:56 PM p 12/12 pval < 0.001

Original vs Sample02\Sample02_5.wav
Playback Range: 00.000 to 24.000
    2:18:32 PM p 1/1 pval = 0.5
    2:18:34 PM p 2/2 pval = 0.25
    2:18:36 PM p 3/3 pval = 0.125
    2:18:40 PM p 4/4 pval = 0.062
    2:18:43 PM p 5/5 pval = 0.031
    2:18:45 PM p 6/6 pval = 0.015
    2:18:47 PM p 7/7 pval = 0.0070
    2:18:49 PM p 8/8 pval = 0.0030

Original vs Sample02\Sample02_4.wav
Playback Range: 00.000 to 24.000
    2:17:08 PM p 1/1 pval = 0.5
    2:17:10 PM p 2/2 pval = 0.25
    2:17:11 PM p 3/3 pval = 0.125
    2:17:13 PM p 4/4 pval = 0.062
    2:17:14 PM p 5/5 pval = 0.031
    2:17:15 PM p 6/6 pval = 0.015
    2:17:17 PM p 7/7 pval = 0.0070
    2:17:18 PM p 8/8 pval = 0.0030

Original vs Sample02\Sample02_1.wav
Playback Range: 00.000 to 24.000
    2:18:00 PM p 1/1 pval = 0.5
    2:18:02 PM p 2/2 pval = 0.25
    2:18:04 PM p 3/3 pval = 0.125
    2:18:07 PM p 4/4 pval = 0.062
    2:18:09 PM p 5/5 pval = 0.031
    2:18:12 PM p 6/6 pval = 0.015
    2:18:14 PM p 7/7 pval = 0.0070
    2:18:17 PM p 8/8 pval = 0.0030